下载辰思小说免费APP
HenryLonguevilleMansel(1820-1871),(5*)Hamilton’smostnoteworthyinterpreter,wasatypicalOxforddon,asbecamehisbirth。Hewasthedescendantofanoldfamilyofcountry-gentlemen,theyoungermembersofwhichhadenteredthearmyornavyorheldthefamilyliving。Hehadbeenabrilliantschoolboy,haddistinguishedhimselfinOxfordexaminations,andbecameknownasawitincommon-rooms,awriterofvivacioussquibs,andasoundToryandhighChurchman。Hehadaclearintellect,aforciblestyle,andhadstudiedtheologyandGermanmetaphysicswithremarkableenergy。HeapparentlybeganasaKantian;buthewasgreatlyimpressedbySirWilliamHamilton,withwhomhehadnopersonalrelations;andheadoptedfromHamiltonthepeculiartheorywhichwastoenlistKantintheserviceofthechurchofEngland。HisBamptonLecturesin1858
madehimfamousasachampionoforthodoxy。In1868hewasappointedtothedeaneryofStPaul’s;buthislabourshadbeentoomuchforhisbrain,andhediedsuddenlyin1871。
HamiltonstartedunderthedoubleinfluenceoftheScottishphilosophyandofAristotle。Formallogicwastohimthemostcongenialofstudies。Hewouldhavebeenthoroughlyinhiselementinthemedievalschools,syllogisingtothedeath。
Accordingtoanenthusiasticpupil,helaidthetopstoneonthefabricfoundedbythe’masterhandoftheStagirite。’(6*)Hewasinhiselementwhendividing,subdividing,andcross-dividingallmannerofphilosophicaltenets。Theaimwasadmirable。Tohaveallopinionsproperlyarticulatedandcorrelatedwouldbethefinalresultofahistoryofphilosophyandasteptofurtherprogress。Thedangerofacceptingsuchaclassificationprematurelyisequallyobvious。Thetechnicaltermsofmetaphysicshavethemostprovokinghabitofshiftingtheirmeaning;theyshadeoffimperceptiblyintoeachother,andsometimesevenchangeplaces;theyrepresentaspectsoftruthcaughtfromaparticularpointofview,whichbecomeinapplicableorcarrydifferentimplicationsasthepointofviewimperceptiblyshifts。Whatappeartobecontradictoryutterancesmaybemerelyqualificationsofeachother,ormaymeanthesamethingindifferentdialects。Asystembuiltofsuchunsubstantialandslipperymaterialsisapttocrumbleintomerechaoswithoutextremecareandpenetration。Hamilton,mostfullyawareofthisingeneralterms,wasneverthelessnotsufficientlyonhisguard。
Healwaysseemstofancythathecanavoidallambiguitiesbyadefinition,anddoesnotrememberthatthewordsbywhichhedefinesareasshiftingintheirsenseastheworddefined。TheconsiderationisespeciallyimportantbecauseitisHamilton’smainpurposetomediatebetweenconflictingopinions。HestartsfromReid’s’common-sense,’andhastoshowhowthepositioncanbeprotectedagainstscepticismontheonesideandmysticismontheother。
Cousin,asadiscipleoftheScottishphilosophers,representedonelineofdeviationfromthejudiciousmean。
BeginningwithReid,hehadbecome,withcertainreserves,afollowerordeveloperofSchelling。Coleridge’s’genialcoincidence’withSchellinghadledtonoverytangibleresult;
butCousin’ssystematicdevelopmentshowedthephilosophydivergingintoafalsetrack,andwastingitselfuponthepursuitofutterlychimericalaims。Hamilton,therefore,endeavouredtoexposethefallaciesinvolvedinthewholeprocedure。Heagreed,asweshallsee,withanimportantpartofKant’sdoctrine;butthoughtthatbycertainoversightsKanthadopenedthedoortoSchelling’semptyspeculations。TherewasanoppositedangertowhichHamiltonwasequallyawake。HeinsisteduponitinanarticlepublishedOctober1830uponthe’PhilosophyofPerception。’Thisis,inthemain,afierceattackuponBrown——
theonephilosophicalwriterofwhomhecannotspeakwithoutbetrayingprejudice。Hamilton’santipathyhasbeenalreadyexplained。BrownshowsScottishphilosophylapsingintomereempiricismand’inductivepsychology。’Hamiltonnevermentionshimwithoutaccusinghimofblundersandofcrassignorance。
Hamiltonthusstandsupfortheorthodoxcommon-sensetheoryofReid,andresentsbackslidingsintotranscendentalismontherighthandandsensationalismontheleft。LiketheexcellentDavidDeans,hewouldkeepthe’ridgeofthehill,wherewindandwatershears。’When,however,hesetabouttheeditionofReid’sworks,hebegantodiscoverinconsistencies。HedoubtedwhetherReidhadreallytaughtthetruefaith;andhewasledtorestatemorearticulatelyhisownview。Totheendofhislife,however,HamiltoncalledhimselfaNaturalRealist;andheld,thoughwithincreasingqualifications,thatReid’sdoctrinewasanapproximatestatementofthesamedoctrine。WhatNaturalRealismmaybeisanotherquestio