METAPHYSICS

第25章

Itisclearalsothatthesoulistheprimarysubstanceandthe

bodyismatter,andmanoranimalisthecompoundofbothtaken

universally;and’Socrates’or’Coriscus’,ifeventhesoulof

SocratesmaybecalledSocrates,hastwomeanings(forsomemeanby

suchatermthesoul,andothersmeantheconcretething),butif

’Socrates’or’Coriscus’meanssimplythisparticularsoulandthis

particularbody,theindividualisanalogoustotheuniversalinits

composition。

Whetherthereis,apartfromthematterofsuchsubstances,

anotherkindofmatter,andoneshouldlookforsomesubstanceother

thanthese,e。g。numbersorsomethingofthesort,mustbe

consideredlater。Foritisforthesakeofthisthatwearetryingto

determinethenatureofperceptiblesubstancesaswell,sinceina

sensetheinquiryaboutperceptiblesubstancesistheworkofphysics,

i。e。ofsecondphilosophy;forthephysicistmustcometoknownot

onlyaboutthematter,butalsoaboutthesubstanceexpressedinthe

formula,andevenmorethanabouttheother。Andinthecaseof

definitions,howtheelementsintheformulaarepartsofthe

definition,andwhythedefinitionisoneformula(forclearlythe

thingisone,butinvirtueofwhatisthethingone,althoughit

hasparts?),-thismustbeconsideredlater。

Whattheessenceisandinwhatsenseitisindependent,has

beenstateduniversallyinawaywhichistrueofeverycase,andalso

whytheformulaoftheessenceofsomethingscontainsthepartsof

thethingdefined,whilethatofothersdoesnot。Andwehavestated

thatintheformulaofthesubstancethematerialpartswillnotbe

present(fortheyarenotevenpartsofthesubstanceinthatsense,

butoftheconcretesubstance;butofthisthereisinasensea

formula,andinasensethereisnot;forthereisnoformulaofit

withitsmatter,forthisisindefinite,butthereisaformulaof

itwithreferencetoitsprimarysubstance-e。g。inthecaseofmanthe

formulaofthesoul-,forthesubstanceistheindwellingform,from

whichandthemattertheso-calledconcretesubstanceisderived;e。g。

concavityisaformofthissort,forfromthisandthenosearise

’snubnose’and’snubness’);butintheconcretesubstance,e。g。a

snubnoseorCallias,thematteralsowillbepresent。Andwehave

statedthattheessenceandthethingitselfareinsomecasesthe

same;ie。inthecaseofprimarysubstances,e。g。curvatureandthe

essenceofcurvatureifthisisprimary。(Bya’primary’substanceI

meanonewhichdoesnotimplythepresenceofsomethinginsomething

else,i。e。insomethingthatunderliesitwhichactsasmatter。)But

thingswhichareofthenatureofmatter,orofwholesthatinclude

matter,arenotthesameastheiressences,norareaccidentalunities

likethatof’Socrates’and’musical’;forthesearethesameonly

byaccident。

Nowletustreatfirstofdefinition,insofaraswehavenot

treatedofitintheAnalytics;fortheproblemstatedinthemis

usefulforourinquiriesconcerningsubstance。Imeanthis

problem:-whereincanconsisttheunityofthat,theformulaofwhich

wecalladefinition,asforinstance,inthecaseofman,’two-footed

animal’;forletthisbetheformulaofman。Why,then,isthisone,

andnotmany,viz。’animal’and’two-footed’?Forinthecaseof’man’

and’pale’thereisapluralitywhenonetermdoesnotbelongtothe

other,butaunitywhenitdoesbelongandthesubject,man,hasa

certainattribute;forthenaunityisproducedandwehave’the

paleman’。Inthepresentcase,ontheotherhand,onedoesnot

shareintheother;thegenusisnotthoughttoshareinits

differentiae(forthenthesamethingwouldshareincontraries;for

thedifferentiaebywhichthegenusisdividedarecontrary)。Andeven

ifthegenusdoesshareinthem,thesameargumentapplies,since

thedifferentiaepresentinmanaremany,e。g。endowedwithfeet,

two-footed,featherless。Whyaretheseoneandnotmany?Notbecause

theyarepresentinonething;foronthisprincipleaunitycanbe

这是VIP章节,可购买本章或开通会员后阅读
开通会员
字体大小
背景颜色