下载辰思小说免费APP
Inthefirstplace,itmustbenoticedthatthetheoryitselfhadbeenalreadyemphaticallystatedbyDestuttdeTracy。HamiltonaccusesBrownofplagiarism。21Whetherhisaccusationbejustifiableornot,itiscertainlytruethatBrownhadinsomewayreachedthesameprincipleswhichhadbeenalreadysetforthbyaleading’ideologist’Brown,thatis,thoughtheofficialexponentoftheScottishphilosophy,wasinthisphilosophicaltenetatonewiththeschoolwhichtheyregardedasmaterialisticorsceptical,thepathbywhichhereacheshisconclusionsisalsocharacteristic。
BrownhasreversedtheinterpretationofReid’sexperimentumcrucis,Iwillgiveupmycase,saysReid,ifyoucanmaketheexternalworldoutofsensations,that,repliesBrown,ispreciselywhatwecando。HowfromsensationsdowegetwhatBerkeleycalled’outness’?Wegetit,saysBrown,fromthesenseofresistanceor’impededeffort,’thatrevealstousthefactthatthereissomethingindependentofourselves,andthebeliefinsuchasomethingispreciselywhatwemean,andallthatwemean,bythebeliefinanexternalworld。,Consistentlywiththis,BrownrejectsReid’sdistinctionbetweentheprimaryandsecondaryqualities。Thedistinctioncorrespondsnodoubttosomerealdifferences,butthereisnodifferenceofthekindsuggestedbyReid。’All[thequalities]
arerelativeandequallyrelative——ourperceptionofextensionandresistanceasmuchasourperceptionoffragranceandbitterness。’22Weascribethesensationsto’externalobjects,’buttheobjectsareonlyknownbythe’medium’ofoursensations。Inotherwords,thewholeworldmayberegardedasasetofsensations,whetherofsight,smell,touch,orresistancetomuscularmovement,accompaniedbythebeliefthattheyarecausedbysomethingnotourselves,andofwhichsomethingwecanonlysaythatitisnotourselves。
Oncemore,theanalysisoftheprocessbywhichthebeliefisgeneratedissignificant。Fromresistance,orthesensationproducedwhensomething’resistsourattemptstograspit,’wegetthe’outness,’thenperceptionis’nothingmorethantheassociationofthiscomplexnotionwithourothersensations——thenotionofsomethingextendedandresisting,suggestedbythesesensations,whenthesuggestionsthemselveshavepreviouslyarisen,andsuggestedinthesamemannerandonthesameprincipleasanyotherassociatefeelingsuggestsanyotherassociatefeeling。’23Theodourorcolourofaroserecallsthesensationoftouchingandofresistancetoourgrasp。Thusweregardthewholegroupofsensationsasduetotheexternalcausewhichproducesthesensationofresistance。Brownseemstohesitatealittleastowhetherheshallappealtoan’intuition’orto’association,’but’asIratherthink,’hesays,thebeliefisfounded’onassociationsaspowerfulasintuition,’24
Whatever,then,maybetheoriginofthebelief——’intuition’or’association’——itisclearthatitcangiveusnoknowledgeexceptsuchasisderivedfromsensations。
Moreover,Brownisthusled,asinthedoctrineofcausation,toacceptareallyscepticalposition。HedeclaresthatheisinthisrespectatonewithbothReidandHume。Theybothaccepttwopropositions:first,thatwecannot’bymerereasoning’provetheexistenceofanexternalworld;
secondly,thatitis’absolutelyimpossibleforusnottobelieve’initsexistence。Hume,hesays,pronouncesthefirstpropositionina’loudtoneofvoice’and’whispers’thesecond。Reid,conversely,passesoverthefirstrapidlyand’dwellsonthesecondwithatoneofconfidence。’25Brownacceptsbothstatements。HehasalreadysaidthatthereisnoargumentagainstBerkeley’sdenialofmatteranymorethanagainstthe’infinitedivisibilityofmatter。’Butheadds,itis’physicallyimpossible’forustoadmittheconclusion,atleastwithout’aninstantdissentfromamomentarylogicaladmission。’26This,indeed,isbutaversionofHume’sfamiliarstatementthatBerkeley’sargumentsadmitofnoreplyandproducenoconviction。
AnotheressentialdoctrineoftheMills,the’associatio