Forty Centuries of Ink

第1章

Theunfortunateconditionssurroundingthealmostuniversaluseoftheoddlynamedcommercialandwithfewexceptionsrecordinks,andtheso-calledmodernpaper,isthemotiveforthewritingofthisbook。

Thenumerouscolorproductsofcoaltar,nowsolargelyemployedinthepreparationofink,andtheworsematerialutilizedinthemanufactureofthehard-

finishedwritingpapers,menacethefuturepreservationofpublicandotherrecords。Thosewhooccupyofficialpositionandwhocanhelptoamelioratethisincreasingevil,shouldbegintodosowithoutdelay。

AbroadEngland,GermanyandFranceandathomeMassachusettsandConnecticuthavesoughttomodifytheseconditionsbylegislationandourNationalTreasuryDepartmentonlylastyear,inestablishingastandardforitsink,givesofficialrecognitionofthesetruths。

Thereisno“HistoryofInk;“butofinkhistorythereisawealthofmaterial,althoughhistorianshaveneglectedtorecordinformationabouttheverysubstancebywhichtheysoughttokeepandtransmitthechroniclestheymostdesiredtopreserve。FromthebeginningoftheChristianeratothepresentday,“Ink“literature,exclusiveofitsetymology,chemicalformulas,andmethodsofmanufacture,hasbeenconfinedtobriefstatementsintheencyclopedias,whichbutrepeateachother。Ahalfdozenoriginalarticles,coveringonlysomeparticularbranchtogetherwithafewtreatisesmoregeneralintheirramificationsofthesubject,canalsobefound。Seventylinesabout“writingink“coveringitshistoryfornearlyfourthousandyearsisallthatissaidin“TheOriginandProgressofHandwriting。”arevisedbookofhundredsofpagesofSirThomasAstle,London,1876,andoncedeemedtheveryhighestauthority。

Themassofancientandcomparativelymoderndocumentswhichwehaveinherited,chroniclenothingaboutthematerialwithwhichtheywerewritten。

Themorevaluableofthemaredisfiguredbythesuperscriptionofnewerwritingsoverthepartiallyerasedearlierones,thusrenderingtheworkofascertainingtheirrealcharactermostdifficult。

Nevertheless,patientresearchandadvancedsciencehaveenabledustointelligentlystudyandinvestigate,andfromtheevidencethusgained,tostatefactsandformulateopinionsthatmayperhapsoutlastcriticism。

Thebibliographicalstoryof“Ink“isrepletewithmanyinterestingepisodes,anecdotesandpoeticaleffusions。

Itschemicalhistoryisavariedandphenomenalone。Beforethenineteenthcenturytheinkindustrywasconfinedtothefew。Sincethen,ithasdevelopedintooneofmagnificentproportions。Thenewdeparture,duetothediscoveryanddevelopmentofthe“Aniline“familyoffugitivecolors,isnoteworthyasbeingastepbackwardwhichmaytakeyearstoretrace。

Thecriminalabuseofinkisnotinfrequentbyevil-

disposedpersonswhotrybysecretprocessestoreproduceinkphenomenaonancientandmoderndocuments。

Whileitispossibletomakeanewinklookold,themethodsthatmustbeemployed,willofthemselvesrevealtotheexaminertheattemptedfraud,ifhebutknowshowtoinvestigate。

Howtoaccomplishthisaswellastogiveachronologicalhistoryonthesubjectofinksgenerally,bothastotheirgenesis,theeffectoftimeandtheelements,thedeterminationoftheconstituentsandtheconstitutionofinks,theirvalueastolastingqualities,theirremovalandrestoration,istheobjectofthiswork。

Thereisalsoincludedmanycourtcaseswherethematterofinkwasincontroversy;informationrespectingancientMSS。andtheimplementsandotheraccessoriesofinkwhichhavefromtimetotimebeenemployedintheactofwriting。

Tomakeacomprehensivereviewofthepastinitsrelationshiptoinkhasbeenmyaim。Intheconstructionofthisworkrecoursehasbeenhadtotheso-

calledoriginalsourcesofinformation。Inthese,thediversityoftheirincompletestatementsaboutdifferentcountriesandepochshasofferedmanyobstacles。

Inpresentingmyowndeductionsandinferences,itiswithadesiretoremoveanyimpressionsastothisvolumebeingamerecompilation。“Factsarethedataofalljustreasoning,andtheelementsofallrealknowledge。Itfollowsthatheisawisemanwhopossessesthegreateststoreoffactsonagivensubject。

Abook,therefore,whichassemblesfactsfromtheirscatteredsources,maybeconsideredasausefulandimportantauxiliarytothosewhoseekthem。”AprolongedandcontinuousintercourseforoveraquarterofacenturywithancientandmodernMSS,withbooksandotherliterature,withlaymenandchemists,withstudentsandmanufacturers,togetherwiththeinformationandknowledgederivedfromexperimentandstudyofresultsmayenabletheauthortomakethesubjectfairlyclear。EfforthasbeenmadetoavoidtechnicalwordsandphrasesinthatportiontreatingoftheChemistryofInks。

Thisworkwillnodoubtbevariouslyconsidered。

Criticismisexpected,indeeditisgladlyinvited,fortherebymayfollowcontroversy,discussionandperhapslegislation,whichwillbringaboutresultsbeneficialtothosewhoaretofollowafterus。

CONTENTS

I。GENESISOFINK

II。ANTIQUITYOFINK

III。CLASSICALINKANDITSEXODUS

IV。CLASSICALINKANDITSEXODUS(Continued)

V。REVIVALOFINK

VI。INKOFTHEWEST

VII。EARLYMEDIAEVALINK

VIII。MEDIAEVALINK

IX。ENDOFMEDIAEVALINK

X。RENAISSANCEINK

XI。ANCIENTINKTREATISES

XII。STUDYOFINK

XIII。STUDYOFINK

XIV。CLASSIFICATIONSOFINK

XV。OFFICIALANDLEGALINK

XVI。ENDURINGINK

XVII。INKPHENOMENA

XVIII。INKCHEMISTRY

XIX。FRAUDULENTINKBACKGROUNDS

XX。FUGITIVEINK。

XXI。ANCIENTANDMODERNINKRECEIPTS

XXII。INKINDUSTRY。

XXIII。CHEMICO-LEGALINK

XXIV。CHEMICO-LEGALINK(Continued)

XXV。INKUTENSILSOFANTIQUITY

XXVI。INKUTENSILS(QuillPENv。SteelPen)

XXVII。SUBSTITUTESFORINKUTENSILS(“Lead“andotherPencils)

XXVIII。ANCIENTINKBACKGROUNDS(TheOriginofPapyrus)

XXIX。ANCIENTINKBACKGROUNDS(ParchmentandVellum)

XXX。MODERNINKBACKGROUNDS(TruePaper)

XXXI。MODERNINKBACKGROUNDS(WoodPaperandSafetyPaper)

XXXII。CURIOSA(InkandotherWritingMaterials)

FORTYCENTURIESOFINK

CHAPTERI。

GENESISOFINK。

THEORIGINOFINK——COMPOSITIONOFTHECOLORED

INKSOFANTIQUITY——ANCIENTNAMESFORBLACK

INKS——METHODSOFTHEIRMANUFACTURE——THEINVENTION

OF“INDIAN“INK——THEARTOFDYEING

HISTORICALLYCONSIDERED——THESYMBOLICESTIMATION

OFCOLORS——THEEMPLOYMENTOFTINCTURES

ASINKS——CONSIDERATIONOFTHEANTIQUITY

OFARTIFICIALINKSANDTHEBLACKINKSOFINTERMEDIATE

TIMES——ORIGINOFTHECOLOREDPIGMENTS

OFANTIQUITY-CITATIONSFROMHERODOTUS,PLINYANDARBUTHNOT——PRICESCURRENT,OFANCIENT

INKSANDCOLORS——WHYTHENATURALINKS

FORMERLYEMPLOYEDARENOTSTILLEXTANT——THE

KINDOFINKEMPLOYEDBYTHEPRIESTSINTHE

TIMEOFMOSES——ILLUSTRATIVEHISTORYOFTHE

EGYPTIANSINITSRELATIONSHIPTOWRITING

IMPLEMENTS——THEUSEOFBOTHREDANDBLACKINK

INJOSEPH’STIME——ITSOTHERHISTORYPRECEDING

THEDEPARTUREOFISRAELFROMEGYPT——THE

DISAPPEARANCEOFALLBUTAFEWKINDSOF

INK——INKTRADITIONSANDTHEIRVALUE——STORY

ABOUTTHEORACLESOFTHESIBYLS——HOWTHEANCIENT

HISTORIANSSOUGHTTOBEMISLEADING——ILLUSTRATIVE

ANECDOTEBYRICHARDSON:

THEoriginofInkbelongstoanerafollowingtheinventionofwriting。Whenthedevelopmentofthatarthadadvancedbeyondtheageofstoneinscriptionorclaytablet,somematerialformarkingwiththereedandthebrushwasnecessary。Itwasnotdifficulttoobtainblackorcoloredmixturesforthispurpose。

Withtheiradvent,fortycenturiesormoreago,beginsthegenesisofink。

Thecoloredinksofantiquityincludedtheuseofavarietyofdyesandpigmentarycolors,typicalofthoseemployedintheancientartofdyeing,inwhichtheEgyptiansexcelledandstillthoughtbymanytobeoneofthelostarts。TheBibleandallegedcontemporaryandlaterliteraturemakefrequentmentionofblackandmanycolorsofbrillianthues。

Intracingtheartsofhandwritinganddyeing,somedefinitefactsaretobepredicatedastothemostremotehistoryofink。

TheHebrewwordforinkisdeyo,socalledfromitsblackness。Asprimitivelypreparedforritualisticpurposesandforacontinuingperiodofmorethantwothousandyears,itwasasimplemixtureofpowderedcharcoalorsootwithwater,towhichgumwassometimesadded。

TheArabianmethodsofmakingink(alchiber)weremorecomplex。Lampblackwasfirstmadebytheburningofoil,tarorrosin,whichwasthencommingledwithgumandhoneyandpressedintosmallwafersorcakes,towhichwatercouldbeaddedwhenwantedforuse。

About1200yearsbeforetheChristianera,theChineseperfectedthismethodandinvented“IndianInk。”

ostensiblyforblackeningthesurfaceofraisedhieroglyphics,which“wasobtainedfromthesootproducedbythesmokeofpinesandtheoilinlamps,mixedwiththeisinglass(gelatin)ofasses’skin,andmusktocorrecttheodouroftheoil。”DuHaldecitesthefollowing,asofthetimeofthecelebratedEmperorWu-Wong,whoflourished1120yearsbeforeChrist:

“AsthestoneMe(awordsignifyingblackeningintheChineselanguage),whichisusedtoblackentheengravedcharacters,canneverbecomewhite;

soaheartblackenedbyviceswillalwaysretainitsblackness。”

Thattheartofdyeingwasknown,valuedandappliedamongearlynations,isabundantlyclear。Theallusionsto“purpleandfineraiment。”to“dyedgarments。”

to“clothofmanycolours。”&c。arenumerousintheBible。Inanotetothe“PictorialBible,afteranallusiontotheantiquityofthisart,andtothepre-

eminenceattachedbytheancientstopurplebeyondeveryothercolor,itisremarked:“Itisimportanttounderstandthatthewordpurple,inancientwritings,doesnotdenoteoneparticularcolour。”

Manyofthenamesofthedyestuffshavecomedowntous,someofthemstillinuseatthistimeandothersobsolete。Theywereemployedsometimesasink,andcertaincolorvaluesgiventothem,ofwhichthemoreimportantwereblue,red,yellow,green,white,black,purple,goldandsilver。Somecolorswereestimatedsymbolically。Whitewaseverywherethesymbolofpurityandtheemblemofinnocence,and,justopposite,blackwasheldupasanemblemofafflictionandcalamity。

Greenwastheemblemoffreshness,vigorandprosperity。

Bluewasthesymbolofrevelation;itwaspre-eminentlythecelestialcolorblessedamongheathennations,andamongtheHebrewsitwastheJehovahcolor,thesymbolofthereveredGod。Hence,itwasthecolorpredominantinMosaicceremonies。

Purplewasassociatedasthedressofkings,withideasofroyaltyandmajesty。

Crimsonandscarlet,fromtheirresemblancetoblood,becamesymbolicaloflife,andalsoanemblemofthatwhichwasindelibleordeeplyingrained。

Later,inChristiantimes,onlyfivecolorswererecognizedasfittingfortheologicalmeaningorexpression:

white,red,green,violetandblack。

Whitewasesteemedasbeingtheunionofalltheraysoflight,andisoftenreferredtoasthesymboloftruthandspotlesspurity。Redwasemblematicbothoffireandlove,whilegreenfromitsanalogytothevegetableworld,wasindicativeoflifeandhope。Violetwasconsideredthecolorofpenitenceandsorrow。

BluewasforbiddenexceptasacolorpeculiarlyappropriatedtotheVirginMary,whileblackrepresenteduniversallysorrow,destructionanddeath。

TheartofdyeingwasalsowellunderstoodandpracticedinPersiainthemostancientperiods。ThemodernPersianshavechosenChristastheirpatron,andBischoffsaysatpresentcalladyehouseChrist’sworkshop,fromatraditiontheyhavethatHewasofthatprofession,whichisprobablyfoundedontheoldlegend“thatChristbeingputapprenticetoadyer,Hismasterdesiredhimtodyesomepiecesofclothofdifferentcolors;Heputthemallintoaboiler,andwhenthedyertookthemouthewasterriblyfrightenedonfindingthateachhaditspropercolor。”

This,orasimilarlegend,occursintheapocryphalbookentitled,“TheFirstGospeloftheInfancyofJesusChrist。”Thefollowingisthepassage:

“Onacertaindayalso,whentheLordJesuswasplayingwiththeboys,andrunningabout,Hepassedbyadyer’sshopwhosenamewasSalem,andtherewereinhisshopmanypiecesofclothbelongingtothepeopleofthatcity,whichtheydesignedtodyeofseveralcolors。ThentheLord,Jesus,goingintothedyer’sshop,tookalltheclothsandthrewthemintothefurnace。WhenSalemcamehomeandsawtheclothspoiled,hebegantomakeagreatnoiseandtochidetheLordJesus,saying:’WhathastThoudone,untome,OthousonofMary?Thouhastinjuredbothmeandmyneighbors;theyalldesiredtheirclothsofapropercolor,butThouhastcomeandspoiledthemall。’

TheLordJesusreplied:’Iwillchangethecolorofeveryclothtowhatcolorthoudesirest,’andthenHepresentlybegantotaketheclothsoutofthefurnace;andtheywerealldyedofthosesamecolorswhichthedyerdesired。AndwhentheJewssawthissurprisingmiracletheypraisedGod。”

Theancientsusedalsoanumberoftincturesasink,amongthemabrowncolor,sepia,inHebrewtekeleth。Asanaturalinkitsoriginantedateseveryotherink,artificialorotherwise,intheworld。Itisablack-brownliquor,secretedbyasmallglandintoanovalpouch,andthroughaconnectingductisejectedatwillbythecuttlefishwhichinhabitstheseasofEurope,especiallytheMediterranean。Thesefishconstantlyemploythecontentsoftheir“inkbags“

todiscolorthewater,wheninthepresenceofenemies,inordertofacilitatetheirescapefromthem。

TheblackbrothoftheSpartanswascomposedofthisproduct。TheEgyptianssometimesuseditforcoloringinscriptionsonstone。Itisthemostlastingofallnaturalinksubstances。

Sogreatistheantiquityofartificialinkthatthenameofitsinventorordateofitsinventionarealikeunknown。ThepoetWhiteheadreferstoitasfollows:

Hardthathisnameitshouldnotsave,Whofirstpouredforththesablewave。”

Thecommonblackinkoftheancientswasessentiallydifferentincompositionandlessliabletofadethanthoseusedatthepresenttime。Itwasnotastainlikeours,andwhenHoracewrote“Andyetasinkthefairestpaperstains,Soworthlessversepollutesthefairestdeeds。”

hemusthavehadinmindthevitriolicinkofhisowntime。

Butlittleinformationrelativetoblackinksoftheintermediatetimeshascomedowntous,anditisconveyedthroughquestionedwritingsofauthorswhoflourishedabouttheperiodofthelifeofJesusChrist;

theYoungerPlinyandDioscoridesarethemostprominentofthem。Theypresentmanycuriousrecipes。

Oneofthese,suggestedbyPliny,isthattheadditionofaninfusionofwormwoodtoinkwillpreventthedestructionofMSS。bymice。

FromamemoirbyM。Roussetuponthepigmentsanddyesusedbytheancients,itwouldappearthatthevarietywasveryconsiderable。Amongthewhitecolors,theywereacquaintedwithwhitelead;andfortheblacks,variouskindsofcharcoalandsootwereused。Animalskinsweredyedblackwithgallapplesandsulphateofiron(copper)。Brownpigmentsweremadebymixingdifferentkindsofochre。UnderthenameofAlexanderblue,theancients——EgyptiansaswellasGreeksandRomans——usedapigmentcontainingoxideofcopper,andalsoonecontainingcobalt。

Fabricsweredyedbluebymeansofpastel-wood。

Yellowpigmentswereprincipallyderivedfromweld,saffron,andothernativeplants。

Vermilion,redochre,andminium(redlead)wereknownfromaremoteantiquity,althoughtheartificialpreparationofvermilionwasasecretpossessedonlybytheChinese。

ThetermscarletasemployedintheOldTestamentwasusedtodesignatetheblood-redcolorprocuredfromaninsectsomewhatresemblingcochineal,foundingreatquantitiesinArmeniaandothereasterncountries。TheArabiannameoftheinsectisKermez(whencecrimson)。Itfrequentstheboughsofaspeciesoftheilextree:ontheseitlaysitseggsingroups,whichbecomecoveredwithasortofdown,sothattheypresenttheappearanceofvegetablegallsorexcrescencesfromthetreeitselfandaredescribedassuchbyPlinyXVI,12,whoalsogaveitthenameofgranum,probablyonaccountofitsresemblancetoagrainorberry,whichhasbeenadoptedbymorerecentwritersandistheoriginoftheterm“ingraincolor“

asnowinuse。Thedyeisprocuredfromthefemalegrubalone,which,whenaliveisaboutthesizeofthekernelofacherryandofadarkred-browncolor,butwhendead,shrivelsuptothesizeofagrainofwheatandiscoveredwithabluishmold。Ithasanagreeablearomaticsmellwhichitimpartstothatwithwhichitcomesintocontact。ItwasfirstfoundingeneraluseinEuropeinthetenthcentury。About1550,cochineal,introducedtherefromMexico,wasfoundtobefarricherincoloringmatterandthereforegraduallysupersededtheolderdyestuff。

IndigowasusedinIndiaandEgyptlongbeforetheChristianera;anditisassertedthatblueribbons(strips)foundonEgyptianmummies4500yearsoldhadbeendyedwithindigo。ItwasintroducedintoEuropeonlyinthesixteenthcentury。

Theuseofmadderasareddyestuffdatesfromveryearlytimes。PlinymentionsitasbeingemployedbytheHindoos,PersiansandEgyptians。Inthemiddleagesthenamessandis,warantia,granza,garancia,wereappliedtomadder,thelatter(garance)beingstillretainedinFrance。Thecoloryieldingsubstanceresidesalmostentirelyintheroots。

ChilzonwasthenamegivenbytheancientHebrewstoabluedyeprocuredfromaspeciesofshell-fish。

Herodotus,B。C。443,assertsthatontheshoresoftheCaspianSealivedapeoplewhopaintedtheformsofanimalsontheirgarmentswithvegetabledyes:

“Theyhavetreeswhoseleavespossessapeculiarproperty;theyreducethemtopowder,andthenstriptheminwater;thisformsadyeorcoloringmatterwithwhichtheypaintontheirgarmentsthefiguresofanimals。Theimpressionissuchthatitcannotbewashedout;itappears,indeed,tobewovenintothecloth,andwearsaslongasthegarmentitself。”

Weareinformedbyanotherancientwriterthatthepagannationswereaccustomedtoarraytheimagesoftheirgodsinrobesofpurple。WhentheprophetEzekieltookupalamentationforTyre,hespokeofthe“blueandpurplefromtheislesofElishah“inwhichthepeoplewereclothed。ThisreferenceissaidtodoubtlessrefertotheislandsoftheAegianSea,fromwhencemanyclaim,theTyriansobtainedtheshell-fish,——themurexandpapura,whichproducedthedark-blueandbright-scarletcoloringmaterials,theemploymentofwhichcontributedsomuchtothefameofancientTyre。

Plinytheyoungerconfirmsthisstatement:

“TheTyrian-purplewasthejuiceofthePurpurea,ashell-fish,theveinsofitsneckandjawssecretingthisroyalcolor,butsolittlewasobtainedthatitwasveryrareandcostonethousandDenarii(about$150。00)perpound。”

Amoremodernwriterindiscussingacrimsonorrubycolorsays:

“ByamistakensensetheLatinwordpurpurus,hasbeencalledpurple,byalltheEnglishandFrenchwriters。”

Arbuthnot,London,1727,inhisbook“AncientCoins,WeightsandMeasures。”astheresultofhisexaminationsofthemostancientrecordsestimates:

“ThePurplewasverydear;thereweretwosortsofFisheswhereofitwasmade,thePelagii,(whichwerethosethatwerecaughtinthedeep)

andtheBuccini。ThePelagiumperPoundwasworth50Nummi,(8s。103/4d。),andtheBuceinuntdoublethat,viz。17s。83/4d。(HarduinreadsahundredPoundsatthatprice。)TheTyriandoubleDyeperPoundcouldscarcebeboughtforL359s,13/4d。”

TheveryancientwritersstatethatthemostesteemedoftheTyrianpurpleswerethosewhichcomparedincolorwith“coagulatedbullocks’blood。”

ThisestimationseemstogobacktothetimeofthePhoenicians,whowereexcessivelyfondofthereddershadesofpurplewhichtheyobtainedalsofromseveralvarietiesofshell-fishandcomprehendedundertwospecies;one(Buccinum)foundincliffs,andtheother(Pelagia)whichwascapturedatsea。ThefirstwasfoundonthecoastsoftheMediterraneanandAtlantic。

TheAtlanticshellsaffordedthedarkestcolor,whilethoseofthePhoeniciancoastitselfyieldedscarletshadesofwonderfulintensity。

RespectingthecostanddurabilityoftheTyrianpurple,itisrelatedthatAlexandertheGreatfoundinthetreasuryofthePersianmonarch5,000quintalsofHermionepurpleofgreatbeauty,and180yearsold,andthatitwasworth$125ofourmoneyperpoundweight。ThepriceofdyeingapoundofwoolinthetimeofAugustusisgivenbyPliny,andthatpriceisequaltoabout$160ofourmoney。Itisprobablethathisremarksrefertosomeparticulartintorqualityofcoloreasilydistinguished,althoughnotatallclearlydefinedbyPliny。Healsomentionsasortofpurple,orhyacinth,whichwasworth,inthetimeofJuliusCaesar,100denarii(about$15ofourmoney)perpound。

Thebestauthoritiesofthepresentday,however,areofopinionthatthecelebratedTyrian-purplewasextractedfromamolluskknownastheJanthinaprolongata,ashellabundantintheMediterraneanandverycommonnearNarbonne,wheretheTyrianpurpledye-workswereinoperationatleastsixhundredyearsbeforeChrist。

Thepricecurrentofsomeoftheinksandcolorsofantiquity,asquotedbyArbuthnot,arecitedherewith:

Armenianpurple30hs。=4s。101/3d。

IndiapurplefromoneDenarius,or73/4d。to30

Denarii,19s。412d。

Pelagium,thejuiceofonesortfishesthatdyedpurple,50hs。=8s。07/8d。

Buccinumthejuiceoftheotherfishthatdyedpurple,100hs。=16s。13/4d。

Cinnabar50hs。=8s。07/8d。

Tarentineredpurple,pricenotmentioned。

Melinum,asortofcolourthatcamefromMelos,oneNummus,=115/16d。

Paretonium,asortofcolourthatcamefromaegypt,verylasting,6Denarii,=3s。101/2d。

Myrobalanus,2Denarii,=1s。31/2d。

Thelast-namedsubstanceisthefruitoftheTermi-

nalia,aproductofChinaandtheEastIndies,bestknownasMyrabolamsandmusthavebeenutilizedsolelyforthetannintheycontain,whichLoeweestimatestobeidenticalwithellago-tannicacid,laterdiscoveredinthedivi-divi,afruitgrowninSouthAmerica,andbablahwhichisalsoafruitofaspeciesofAcacia,wellknownalsoforitsgum。

NomonumentsareextantoftheancientMyrabolamink。

AntimonyandgallswereusedbytheEgyptianladiestotinttheireyesandlashesand(whoknows)

towritewith。

Manyofthedyesemployedasinkwerethoseoccurringnaturallyasanimalandvegetableproducts,orwhichcouldbeproducedtherefrombycomparativelysimplemeans,otherwisewewouldnotbeconfrontedwiththefactthatnospecimensofinkwritingofnaturaloriginremaintous。

Theveryfewspecimensofinkwritingwhichhaveoutlasteddecayanddisintegrationthroughsomanyages,arefoundtobecloselyalliedtomaterialslikebitumen,lampblackobtainedfromthesmokeofoil-

torchesorresins;orgold,silver,cinnabarandminium。

JosephusassertsthatthebooksoftheancientHebrewswerewritteningoldandsilver。

“Siccadewat“(Asilverinkstandeth),astheancientArabicproverbruns。

Rosseliniasserts:

“themonumentalhireoglyphicsoftheEgyptianswerealmostinvariablypaintedwiththeliveliesttints;andwhensimilarhireoglyphicswereexecutedonareducedscale,andinamorecursiveformuponpapyriorscrollsmadefromtheleavesofthepapyrusthepageswerewrittenwithbothblackandcoloredinks。”

TheearlymodeofinkwritinginbiblicaltimesmentionedinNumbersv。23,whereItissaid“thepriestshallwritethecursesinabook,andblotthemoutwiththebitterwater。”waswithakindofinkpreparedforthepurpose,withoutanysaltsofironorothermaterialwhichcouldmakeapermanentdye;

thesemaledictionswerethenwashedintothewater,whichthewomanwasobligedtodrink,sothatshedranktheverywordsoftheexecration。TheinkstillusedintheEastisalmostallofthiskind;awetspongewillobliteratethefinestoftheirwritings。

InthebookofJeremiah,chap。xxxvi。verse18,itsays:“ThenBaruchanswered,Hepronouncedallthesewordsuntomewithhismouth,andIwroteTHEMwithinkinthebook。”andinEzek。ix。2,3,11,“Inkhorn“isreferredto。

SixhundredyearslaterintheNewTestamentisanothermentionofink“havingmanythingstowriteuntoyou。IwouldnotwritewithpaperandInk。”

&c。;secondepistle。ofJohn,12,andagaininhisthirdepistle,13,“Ihadmanythingstowrite,butIwillnotwithpenandInkwriteuntothee。”

TheillustrativehistoryoftheancientEgyptiansdoesnotpointtoatimebeforethereedwasusedasapen。Thevarioussculptures,carvings,potteryandpaintings,exhibitthescribesatworkintheiravocations,recordingdetailsaboutthehandsandearsofslaughteredenemies,thenumbersofcaptives,thebasketsofwheat,thenumerousanimals,thetribute,thetreatiesandthepublicrecords。Theseancientscribesemployedacylindricalboxforink,withwritingtablets,whichweresquaresectionsofwoodwithlateralgroovestoholdthesmallreedsforwriting。

DuringthetimeJosephwasViceroyofEgyptunderSethosisI,thefirstofthePharaohs,B。C。1717,heemployedasmallarmyofclerksandstorekeepersthroughoutEgyptinhisextensivegrainoperations。

Thescribeswhosedutiespertainedtomakingrecordsrespectingthisbusiness,usedbothredandblackinks,containedindifferentreceptaclesinadesk,which,whennotinuse,wasplacedinaboxortrunk,withleatherhandlesatthesides,andinthiswaywascarriedfromplacetoplace。Asthescribehadtwocolorsofink,heneededtwopens(reeds)andweseehimonthemonumentsofThebes,busywithonepenatwork,andtheotherplacedinthatmostancientpen-rack,behindtheear。Such,saysMr。Knight,ispresentedinapaintingatBeniHassan。

TheHistoricalSocietyofNewYorkpossessesasmallbundleofthesepens,withthestainsoftheinkyetuponthem,besidesabronzeknifeusedformakingsuchpens(reeds),andwhichareallegedtobelongtoaperiodnotfarremovedfromJoseph’stime。

Theotherhistoryofink,longprecedingthedepartureofIsraelfromEgypt,andwithfewexceptionsuntilafterthemiddleages,canonlybeconsidered,asitisintimatelyboundupinthechronologyandstoryofhandwritingandwritingmaterials。Eventhenitmustnotbesupposedthatthehistoryofinkisauthenticandcontinuousfromthemomenthandwritingwasappliedtotherecordingofevents;fortheearliestrecordsarelosttousinalmosteveryinstance。Wearethereforedependentuponlaterwriters,whomadetheirrecordsintheinksoftheirowntime,andwhocouldrefertothoseprecedingthemonlybytheaidoflegendsandtraditions。

Thereisnoindependentdataindicatinganyvariationwhateverinthemethodsoftheadmixtureofblackorcoloredinks,whichdifferentiatesthemfromthoseusedintheearliesttimesoftheancientEgyptians,HebrewsorChinese。Onthecontraryifweexclude“Indian“andoneoftheredinks,foraperiodoffourteenhundredyearswefindtheirnumberdiminishinguntilthefirstcenturiesoftheChristianera。

Exaggeratedtraditionhasdescribedinksaswellasotherthingsandimaginationisnotlacking。Someoftheselegends,inlateryearsputinwriting,compelustodependontranslationsofobscureandobsoletetongues,whilethemajorityofthemaremingledwiththeerrorsandsuperstitiousofthetimeinwhichtheyweretranscribed。

Thevalueofsuchaccountsdependsuponavarietyofcircumstancesandwemustproceedwiththeutmostcautionanddiscriminationinexaminingandweighingtheauthenticityofthesesourcesofinformation。

Ifwereasonthattheartofhandwritingdidnotbecomeknowntoalltheancientnationsatonce,butwasgraduallyimpartedbyonetoanother,itfollowsthatrecordssupposedtobecontemporaneous,weremadeinsomecountriesatamuchearlierperiodthaninothers。ItmustalsobeobservedthattheAsiaticnationsandtheEgyptianspracticedtheartofwritingmanycenturiesbeforeitwasintroducedintoEurope。

Henceweareabletoestimatewithsomedegreeofcertaintythatink-writtenaccountsofsomeAsiaticnationsweremadewhileEuropewasinthisrespectburiedinutterdarkness。

AninterestingstorywhichbearsonthisstatementistoldbyKennett,inhis“AntiquitiesofRome。”

London,1743,astothediscoveryofancientMSS。fivehundredandtwentyyearsbeforetheChristianera,ofwhateventhenmusthavebeenremarkable:

“AstrangeoldwomancameoncetoTarquiniusSuperbuswithninebooks,which,shesaid,weretheoraclesoftheSybils,andprofferedtosellthem。

Butthekingmakingsomescrupleabouttheprice,shewentawayandburntthreeofthem;andreturningwiththesix,askedthesamesumasbefore。

Tarquinonlylaughedatthehumour;uponwhichtheoldwomanlefthimoncemore;andaftershehadburntthreeothers,cameagainwiththemthatwereleft,butstillkepttoheroldterms。Thekingnowbegantowonderatherobstinacy,andthinkingtheremightbesomethingmorethanordinaryinthebusiness,sentfortheaugars(soothsayers)

toconsultwhatwastobedone。They,whentheirdivinationswereperformed,soonacquaintedhimwhatapieceofimpietyhehadbeenguiltyof,byrefusingatreasuresenttohimfromheaven,andcommandedhimtogivewhatevershedemandedforthebooksthatremained。Thewomanreceivedhermoney,anddeliveredthewritings;andonly,chargingthembyallmeanstokeepthemsacred,immediatelyvanished。Twoofthenobilitywerepresentlyafterchosentobethekeepersoftheseoracles,whichwerelaidupwithallimaginablecareintheCapitol,inachestunderground。TheycouldnotbeconsultedwithoutaspecialorderoftheSenate,whichwasnevergranted,unlessuponthereceivingofsomenotabledefeat;upontherisingofanyconsiderablemutiny,orseditionintheState;oruponsomeotherextraordinaryoccasion;severalofwhichwemeetwithinLivy。”

Someoftheancienthistoriansevensoughttobemisleadingrespectingtheeventsnotonlyoftheirowntimes,butofepochswhichprecededthem。Richardson,inhis“DissertationonAncientHistoryandMythology。”

publishedin1778,remarks:

“TheinformationreceivedhithertohasbeenalmostentirelyderivedthroughthemediumoftheGrecianwriters;whoseeleganceoftaste,harmonyoflanguage,andfinearrangementofideas,havecaptivatedtheimagination,misledthejudgment,andstampedwiththedignifiedtitleofhistory,theamusingexcursionsoffancifulromance。Tooproudtoconsidersurroundingnations,(iftheEyptiansmaybeexcepted)inanylightbutthatofbarbarians;theydespisedtheirrecords,theyalteredtheirlanguage,andframedtoooftentheirdetails,moretotheprejudicesoftheirfellowcitizens,thantothestandardoftruthorprobability。

WehavenamesofPersiankings,whichaPersiancouldnotpronounce;wehavefactsrelatedtheyapparentlyneverknew;andwehavecustomsascribedtothem,whichcontradicteverydistinguishingcharacteristicofanEasternpeople。ThestoryofLysimachusandoneGreekhistorianmayindeed,withjustice,beappliedtomanyothers。

Thisprince,inthepartitionofAlexander’sempire,becameKingofThrace:hehadbeenoneofthemostactiveofthatconqueror’scommanders;andwaspresentateveryeventwhichdeservedtheattentionofhistory。AGrecianhadwrittenanaccountofthePersianconquest;andbewishedtoreaditbeforetheking。Themonarchlistenedwithequalattentionandwonder:’Allthisisveryfine,’sayshe,whenthehistorianhadfinished,’butwherewasIwhenthosethingswereperformed?’“

CHAPTERII。

ANTIQUITYOFINK。

THEINVENTIONOFTHEARTOFWRITING——TOWHOM

ITBELONGS——ITSUTILIZATIONBYNATIONSAND

INDIVIDUALS——WHENITISFIRSTMENTIONEDINTHE

BIBLE——CITATIONSFROMTHEENCYCLOPaeDIABRITANNICA

ANDSMITHSDICTIONARYOFTHEBIBLE——SOME

REMARKSBYHUMPHREYSOFTHEORIGINANDPROGRESS

OFHANDWRITING——COMMENTSBYPLATOAND

THECOLLOQUYBETWEENKINGTHAMUSANDTHOTH,THEEGYPTIANGODOFTHELIBERALARTS——FIRST

APPEARANCEOFINKWRITTENROLLS——DESTRUCTION

OFTHETEMPLESWHICHCONTAINEDTHEM——COMMENTS

OFTHEHISTORIANROLLINS——DESTRUCTION

OFTHEMOSTANCIENTCHINESEINKWRITTENMSS。

THEREisadifferenceofopinionastowhatnationbelongsthehonoroftheinventionoftheartofhandwriting。SirIsaacNewtonobserves:

“Thereistheutmostuncertaintyinthechronologyofancientkingdoms,arisingfromthevanityofeachclaimingthegreatestantiquity,whilethosepretensionswerefavouredbytheirhavingnoexactaccountoftime。”

Itsantiquityhasbeenexhaustivelytreatedbymanywriters;thebestknownareMassey,1763,TheOriginandProgressofLetters;“Astle,1803,“TheOriginandProgressofWriting;“Silvestre,“UniversalPalaeography。”Paris,1839-41;andHumphreys,1855,“TheOriginandProgressoftheArtofWriting。”

They,withothers,havesoughttorecordtheoriginandgradualdevelopmentoftheartofwritingfromtheEgyptianHieroglyphicsof4000B。C。;theChineseFigurative,3000B。C。;IndianAlphabetic,2000ormoreB。C。;theBabylonianorCuneiform,2000

yearsB。C。;andthePhoenicianinwhichtheyincludetheHebreworSamaritanAlphabet,2000ormoreB。C。,downtothewritingsoftheneworWesternworldoftheChristianera。

Thedatapresentedandtheargumentssetforth,deserveprofoundrespect,andthoughwefindsomefavoringtheEgyptians,orthePhoenicians,theChaldeans,theSyrians,theIndians,thePersiansortheArabians,itisbesttoaccepttheconcensusoftheiropinion,whichseemstodividebetweenthePhoeniciansandtheEgyptiansasbeingtheinventorsoftheforemostofallthearts。“For,inPhoenicia,hadlivedTaautorThoththefirstHermes,itsinventor,andwholatercarriedhisartintoEgyptwheretheyfirstwroteinpictures,some2200yearsB。C。”

TheartappearstohavebeenfirstexercisedinGreeceandtheWestabout1500or1800B。C。,andlikeallarts,itwasdoubtlessslowandprogressive。

TheGreeksrefertheinventionofwrittenletterstoCadmus,merelybecauseheintroducedthemfromPhoenicia,thenonlysixteeninnumber。Tothese,fourmorewereaddedbySimonides。EvanderbroughtlettersintoLatiumfromGreece,theLatinlettersbeingatfirstnearlythesameformastheGreek。TheRomansemployedadeviceofscatteringgreensandupontables,fortheteachingofarithmeticandwriting,andinIndiaa“sandbox“consistingofasurfaceofsandlaidonaboardthefingerbeingutilizedtotraceforms,wasthemethodfollowedbythenativestoteachtheirchildren。

Itissaidthatsuchmethodsstillobtaineveninthisage,insomeruraldistrictsofEngland。

Aftertheinventionofwritingwell-informednationsandindividualskeptscribesorchroniclerstorecordinwriting,historicalandotherevents,mingledwithclaimsofantiquitybasedonpopularlegends。

Theseindividualswerenotalwaysheldinthehighestesteem。AmongtheHebrewsitwasconsideredanhonorablevocation,whiletheGreeksforalongtimetreateditspractitionersasoutcasts。ItwasanaccomplishmentpossessedbythefewevendowntothefifteenthcenturyoftheChristianera。TherulersofthedifferentcountriesweredeficientintheartanddependedonotherstowritetheirdocumentsandletterstowhichtheyappendedtheirmonogramorthesignoftheCrossagainsttheirnamesasanattestation。

SolateasA。D。1516anorderwasmadeinLondontoexamineallpersonswhocouldwriteinordertodiscovertheauthorshipofaseditiousdocument。

TheartofwritingisnotmentionedintheBiblepriortothetimeofMoses,althoughasbeforestated,inEgyptandthecountriesadjacenttheretoitwasnotonlyknownbutpracticed。

ItsfirstmentionrecordedinScripturewillbefoundinExodusxvii。v。14;“AndtheLordsaiduntoMoses,Writethis,foramemorial,inabook;andrehearseitintheearofJoshua;forIwillutterlyputouttheremembranceofAmalekfromunderheaven。”

ThiscommandwasgivenimmediatelyafterthedefeatoftheAmalekitesnearHoreb,andbeforethearrivaloftheIsraelitesatMountSinai。

Itisobservable,thatthereisnottheleasthinttoinduceustobelievethatwritingwasthennewlyinvented;

onthecontrary,wemayconclude,thatMosesunderstoodwhatwasmeantbywritinginabook;

otherwiseGodwouldhaveinstructedhim,ashehaddoneNoahinbuildingtheArk;forhewouldnothavebeencommandedtowriteinabook,ifhehadbeenignorantoftheartofwriting;butMosesexpressednodifficultyofcomprehensionwhenhereceivedthiscommand。WealsofindthatMoseswrotealltheworksandallthejudgmentsoftheLord,containedinthetwenty-firstandthetwosucceedingchaptersofthebookofExodus,beforethetwowrittentablesofstonewereevensomuchaspromised。Thedeliveryofthetablesisnotmentionedtilltheeighteenthverseofthethirty-firstchapter,afterGodhadmadeanendofcommuningwithhimuponthemount,thoughthetencommandmentswerepromulgatedimmediatelyafterhisthirddescent。

MosesmakesfrequentmentionofancientbooksoftheHebrews,butdescribesnone,exceptthetwotablesonwhichGodwrotethetencommandments。Thesehetellsus,wereofpolishedstone,engravenonbothsidesandasCalmetremarks:“itisprobablethatMoseswouldnothaveobservedtousthesetwoparticularssooftenashedoes,wereitnottodistinguishthemfromotherbooks,whichweremadeoftables,notofstone,butofwoodandcuriouslyengraven,butononesideonly。”

ItcannotbesaidthatMosesusesanylanguagewhichcanbeconstruedtomeantheemploymentofrollsofpapyrus,orbarksoftrees,muchlessofparchment。

Wehavethereforereasontobelievethatbythetermbook,healwaysmeanstable-books,madeofsmallthinboardsorplates。

Theedicts,aswellasthelettersofkings,werewrittenupontabletsandsenttothevariousprovinces,sealedwiththeirsignets。Scriptureplainlyalludestothecustomofsealingupletters,edictsandthetabletsonwhichtheprophetswrotetheirvisions。

Thepracticeofwritinguponrollsmadeofthebarksoftreesisveryancient。ItisalludedtointheBookofJob:“Oh!thatmineadversaryhadwrittenabook;

surelyIwouldtakeituponmyshoulders,andbinditasacrowntome。”(Oldversion。)Thenewoneruns:“AndthatIhadtheindictmentwhichmineadversaryhathwritten!“Therolls,orvolumes,generallyspeaking,werewrittenupononesideonly。

ThisisintimatedbyEzekielwhoobservesthathesawoneofinextraordinaryformwrittenonbothsides:“AndwhenIlooked,behold,anHandwassentuntome,andlo!arollofabookwastherein;andhespreaditbeforeme,anditwaswrittenwithinandwithout。”

Tohavebeenabletowriteondrytabletsofwoodorbarksoftreeswiththereedorbrush,thethenonlyink-writinginstrumentsinvoguewouldhavenecessitatedtheemploymentoflampblacksuspendedinavehicleofthickgum,orintheformofapaint。Bothofthesemaybetermedpigmentaryinks。Theuseofthininkswouldhavecausedspreadingorblottingandthusrenderedthewritingillegible。

TheEncyclopaediaBritannicageneralizesitsremarksonthissubject:——

“Theearliestwritingswerepurelymonumentalandaccordinglythosematerialswerechosenwhichweresupposedtolastthelongest。Thesameideaofperpetuitywhichinarchitecturefindsitsmoststrikingexpositioninthepyramidswasrepeated,inthecaseofliteraryrecords,inthetwocolumnsmentionedbyJosephus,theoneofstoneandtheotherofbrick,onwhichthechildrenofSethwrotetheirinventionsandastronomicaldiscoveries;inthepillarsinCreteonwhich,accordingtoPorphyry,theceremoniesoftheCorybanteswereinscribed;

intheleadentabletscontaininlutheworksofHesiod,depositedinthetempleoftheMuses,inBoeotia;

inthetencommandmentsonstonedeliveredbyMoses;andinthelawsofSolon,inscribedonplanksofwood。Thenotionofaliteraryproductionsurvivingthedestructionofthematerialsonwhichitwasfirstwritten——the’momentum,aereperennius’

ofHorace’sambition——wasunknownbeforethediscoveryofsubstancesforsystematictranscription。

“TabletsofivoryormetalwereincommonuseamongtheGreeksandRomans。Whenmadeofwood——sometimesofcitron,butusuallyofbeechorfir——theirinnersideswerecoatedwithwax,onwhichthelettersweretracedwithapointedpenorstiletto(stylus),oneendofwhichwasusedforerasure。ItwaswithhisstylusthatCaesarstabbedCascainthearmwhenattackedbyhismurderers。

WaxtabletsofthiskindcontinuedinpartialuseinEuropeduringthemiddleages;theoldestextantspecimen,nowinthemuseumatFlorence,belongstotheyear1301。”

LatertheHebrewScriptureswerewrittenininkorpaintupontheskinsofceremoniallycleananimalsorevenbirds。Thesewererolleduponsticksandfastenedwithacord,theendsofwhichweresealedwhensecuritywasanobject。Theywerewrittenincolumns,andusuallyupononeside,only。Thewritingwasfromrighttoleft;theuppermarginwasthreefingersbroad,theloweronefourfingers;abreadthoftwofingersseparatedthecolumns。Thecolumnsranacrossthewidthofthesheet,therolledendsofwhichwereheldverticallyintherespectivehands。Whenonecolumnwasread,anotherwasexposedtoviewbyunrollingitfromtheendinthelefthand,whiletheformerwashiddenfromviewbyrollinguptheendgraspedbytherightband。Thepenwasareed,theinkblack,carriedinabottlesuspendedfromthegirdle。

TheSamaritanPentateuchisveryancient,asisprovedbythecriticismsofTalmudicwriters。Acopyofitwasacquiredin1616byPietrodellaValle,oneofthefirstdiscoverersofthecuneiforminscriptions。

ItwasthusintroducedtothenoticeofEurope。ItisclaimedbytheSamaritansofNablusthattheircopywaswrittenbyAbisha,thegreat-grandsonofAaron,inthethirteenthyearofthesettlementofthelandofCanaanbythechildrenofIsrael。ThecopiesofitbroughttoEuropeareallwritteninblackinkonvellumor“cotton“paper,andvaryfrom12motofolio。ThescrollusedbytheSamaritansiswritteningoldletters。(SeeSmith’s“DictionaryoftheBible。”

vol。III,pp。1106-1118。)Itsclaimstogreatantiquityarenotadmittedbyscholars。

Theenumerationofsomeofthemodesofwritingmaybeinteresting:

TheMexicanwritingisinverticalcolumns,beginningatthebottom。

TheChineseandJapanesewriteinverticalcolumns,beginningatthetopandpassingfromlefttoright。

TheEgyptianhieroglyphicsarewritteninverticalcolumnsorhorizontallinesaccordingtotheshapeandpositionofthetablet。Itissaidthatwiththehorizontalwritingthedirectionisindifferent,butthatthefiguresofmenandanimalsfacethebeginningoftheline。Withfigures,theunitsstandontheleft。

TheEgyptiansalsowrotefromrighttoleftinthehieraticanddemoticandenchorialstyles。ThePalasgiansdidthesame,andwerefollowedbytheEtruscans。

Inthedemoticcharacter,Dr。Brugschremarksthatthoughthegeneraldirectionofthewritingwasusuallyfromrighttoleft,yettheindividualletterswereformedfromlefttoright,asisevidentfromtheunfinishedendsofhorizontalletterswhentheinkfailedinthepen。

Inwritingnumbersinthehieraticandenchorialtheunitswereplacedtotheleft。TheArabswritefromrighttoleft,butreceivedtheirnumeralsfromIndia,whencetheycallthem“Hindee。”andtherethearrangementoftheirnumeralsislikeourown,unitstotheright。

ThefollowingnoteworthypassageistakenfromHumphreys’work“OntheOriginandProgressoftheArtofWriting:“

“Nearlyalltheprincipalmethodsofancientwritingmaybedividedintosquarecapitals,roundedcapitals,andcursiveletters;thesquarecapitalsbeingtermedsimplycapitals,theroundedcapitalsuncials,andthesmallletters,orsuchashadchangedtheirformduringthecreationofarunninghand,minuscule。Capitalsare,strictlyspeaking,suchlettersasretaintheearliestsettledformofanalphabet;beinggenerallyofsuchangularshapesascouldconvenientlybecarvedonwoodorstone,orengravedinmetal,tobestampedoncoins。TheearliestLatinMSS。knownarewrittenentirelyincapitalslikeinscriptionsinmetalormarble。

*****

Theuncialletters,astheyaretermed,appeartohavearisenaswritingonpapyrusorvellumbecamecommon,whenmanyofthestraightlinesofthecapitals,inthatkindofwriting,graduallyacquiredacurvedform,tofacilitatetheirmorerapidexecution。Howeverthismaybe,fromthesixthtotheeighth,oreven10thcentury,theseuncialsorpartlyroundedcapitalsprevail。

“Themodernminuscule,differingfromtheancientcursivecharacter,appearstohaveariseninthefollowingmanner:Duringthe6thand7thcenturies,akindoftransitionstyleprevailedinItalyandsomeotherpartsofEurope,theletterscomposingwhichhavebeentermedsemi-uncials,which,inafurthertransition,becamemorelikethoseoftheoldRomancursive。Thismanner,whendefinitelyformed,becamewhatisnowtermedtheminusculemanner;itbegantoprevailoveruncialsinacertainclassofMSS。aboutthe8thcentury,andtowardsthe10thitsgeneralusewas,withfewexceptions,established。Itissaidtohavebeenoccasionallyusedasearlyasthe5thcentury;butIamunabletociteanauthenticexistingmonument。ThePsalterofAlfredtheGreat,writteninthe9thcentury,isinasmallRomancursivehand,whichhasinducedCasleytoconsiderittheworkofsomeItalianecclesiastic。”

Thelearnedwhohavemadealifestudyofthehistoryofthemostancientmanuscripts,mentionthemspecificallyingreatnumberandofdifferentcountries,whichwouldseemtoindicatethattheartofhandwritinghadmadegreatstridesintheveryoldentimes;manynationshadadoptedit,andB。C。650“ithadspreaditselfoverthe(thenknown)greaterpartofthecivilizedworld。”

Wecanwellbelievethistobetrueinreadingabouttheancientlibraries,notwithstandingthatsomerulershadsoughttoprohibititsexercise。

Plato,wholivedB。C。350,expresseshisviewsoftheimportanceofwritinginhisimaginarycolloquybetweenThamus,kingofEgypt,andThoth,thegodoftheliberalartsoftheEgyptians;heacquaintsus:

“Thatthediscourseturneduponletters。ThothmaintainedthevalueofWriting,ascapableofmakingthePeoplewiser,increasingthepowersofMemory;tothisthekingdissented,andexpressedhisopinionthatbytheexerciseofthisArtthemultitudewouldappeartobeknowingofthosethingsofwhichtheywerereallyignorant,possessingonlyanideaofWisdom,insteadofWisdomitself。”

Pythagoras,B。C。532,weareinformedbyAstle:

“WentintoEgyptwhereheresidedtwenty-twoyears;hewasinitiatedintothesacerdotalorder,and,fromhisspiritofinquiry,hehasbeenjustlysaidtohaveacquiredagreatdealofEgyptianlearning,whichheafterwardsintroducedintoItaly。

ThePythagoreanschoolswhichheestablishedinItalywhenwritingwastaught,weredestroyedwhenthePlatonicornewphilosophyprevailedovertheformer。Polybius(lib。ii。p。175)andJamblichus(invitaPythag。)mentionmanycircumstances,relativetothesefacts,quotedfromauthorsnowlost;asdothPorphyry,inhislifeofPythagoras。”

Forthehundredyearsormorefollowing,however,thedisseminationoflearningandthetranscriptionofeventswasnottobedenied。Wefindink-writtenvolumes(rolls)relatingtodiversesubjectsbeingloanedtooneanother;correspondencebylettertoandfromdistantlandsoffrequentoccurrence,andtheartofhandwritingregularlytaughtintheschoolsoflearning。

ItsprogresswastobeinterruptedbythewarsofthePersians。Mr。Astleincallingattentiontoeventswhichhavecontributedtodepriveusoftheliterarytreasuresofantiquitythusreferstothem:

“Averyfatalblowwasgiventoliterature,bythedestructionofthePhoeniciantemples,andoftheEgyptiancolleges,whenthosekingdoms,andthecountriesadjacent,wereconqueredbythePersians,aboutthreehundredandfiftyyearsbeforeChrist。Ochus,thePersiangeneral,ravagedthesecountrieswithoutmercy,andfortythousandSidoniansburntthemselveswiththeirfamiliesandrichesintheirownhouses。TheconquerorthendroveNectanebusoutofEgypt,andcommittedthelikeravagesinthatcountry;afterwardshemarchedintoJudea,wherehetookJericho,andsentagreatnumberofJewsintocaptivity。ThePersianshadagreatdisliketothereligionofthePhoeniciansandtheEgyptians;thiswasonereasonfordestroyingtheirbooks,ofwhichEusebius(DePreparat。

Evang。)says,theyhadagreatnumber。”

Theselosses,apparently,didnotinterferewiththeprogressoftheartinmorewesterncountries。ProfessorRollininhis“AncientHistory。”1823,remarks:

“PtolemySoter,KingofEgyptB。C。285,hadbeencarefultoimprovehimselfinpublicliterature,aswasevidentbyhiscompilingthelifeofAlexander,whichwasgreatlyesteemedbytheancients,butisnowentirelylost。Inordertoencouragethecultivationofthesciences,whichhemuchadmired,hefoundedanacademyatAlexandria,calledtheMuseum,whereasocietyoflearnedmendevotedthemselvestophilosophicstudies,andtheimprovementofallothersciences,almostinthesamemannerasthoseofLondonandParis。Forthispurpose,hebeganbygivingthemalibrary,whichwasprodigiouslyincreasedbyhissuccessors。

“HissonPhiladelphusleftahundredthousandvolumesinitatthetimeofhisdeath,andthesucceedingprincesofthatraceenlargeditstillmore,tillatlastitconsistedofsevenhundredthousandvolumes。

“Thislibrarywasformedbythefollowingmethod:AlltheGreekandotherbooksthatwerebroughtintoEgyptwereseized,andsenttotheMuseum,wheretheyweretranscribedbypersonsemployedforthatpurpose。Thecopieswerethendeliveredtotheproprietors,andtheoriginalsweredepositedinthelibrary。

“AstheMuseumwasatfirstinthatquarterofthecitywhichwascalledBruchion,andneartheroyalpalace,thelibrarywasfoundedinthesameplace,anditsoondrewvastnumbersthither;butwhenitwassomuchaugmented,astocontainfourhundredthousandvolumes,theybegantodeposittheadditionalbooksintheSerapion。Thislastlibrarywasasupplementtotheformer,forwhichreasonitreceivedtheappellationofitsDaughter,andinprocessoftimehadinitthreehundredthousandvolumes。

“InCaesar’swarwiththeinhabitantsofAlexandria,afire,occasionedbythosehostilities,consumedthelibraryofBruchion,withitsfourhundredthousandvolumes。Senecaseemstometobeoutofhumour,when,speakingoftheconflagration,hebestowshiscensuresbothonthelibraryitself,andtheeulogiummadeonitbyLivy,whostylesitanillustriousmonumentoftheopulenceoftheEgyptiankings,andoftheirjudiciousattentiontotheimprovementofthesciences。Seneca,insteadofallowingittobesuch,wouldhaveitconsideredonlyasaworkresultingfromtheprideandvanityofthosemonarchs,whohadamassedsuchanumberofbooks,notfortheirownuse,butmerelyforpompandostentation。Thisreflection,however,seemstodiscoververylittlesagacity;forisitnotevidentbeyondcontradiction,thatnonebutkingsarecapableoffoundingthesemagnificentlibraries,whichbecomeanecessarytreasuretothelearned,anddoinfinitehonourtothosestatesinwhichtheyareestablished?

“ThelibraryofSerapion,didnotsustainanydamage,anditwasundoubtedlytherethatCleopatradepositedthosetwohundredthousandvolumesfromthatofPergamus,whichwaspresentedtoherbyAntony。Thisaddition,withotherenlargementsthatweremadefromtimetotime,renderedthenewlibraryofAlexandriamorenumerousandconsiderablethanthefirst;andthoughitwasransackedmorethanonce,duringthetroublesandrevolutionswhichhappenedintheRomanempire,italwaysretrieveditslosses,andrecovereditsnumberofvolumes。Inthisconditionitsubsistedformanyages,displayingitstreasurestothelearnedandcurious,tilltheseventhcentury,whenitsufferedthesamefatewithitsparent,andwasburntbytheSaracens,whentheytookthatcityintheyearofourLord642。Themannerbywhichthismisfortunehappenedistoosingulartobepassedoverinsilence。

“John,surnamedtheGrammarian,afamousfollowerofAristotle,happenedtobeatAlexandria,whenthecitywastaken;andashewasmuchesteemedbyAmriEbnolAs,thegeneraloftheSaracentroops,heentreatedthatcommandertobestowuponhimtheAlexandrianlibrary。Amrireplied,thatitwasnotinhispowertograntsucharequest;

butthathewouldwritetotheKhalif,oremperoroftheSaracens,forhisordersonthathead,withoutwhichhecouldnotpresumetodisposeofthelibrary。HeaccordinglywrotetoOmar,thethenKhalif,whoseanswerwas,thatifthosebookscontainedthesamedoctrinewiththeKoran,theycouldnotbeofanyuse,becausetheKoranwassufficientinitself,andcomprehendedallnecessarytruths;

butiftheycontainedanyparticularscontrarytothatbook,theyoughttobedestroyed。Inconsequencetothisanswer,theywereallcondemnedtotheflames,withoutanyfurtherexamination;and,forthatpurpose,weredistributedamongthepublicbaths;where,forthespaceofsixmonths,theywereusedforfuelinsteadofwood。Wemayfromhenceformajustideaoftheprodigiousnumberofbookscontainedinthatlibrary;andthuswasthisinestimabletreasureoflearningdestroyed!

TheMuseumofBruchionwasnotburntwiththelibrarywhichwasattachedtoit。Straboacquaintsus,inhisdescriptionofit,thatitwasaverylargestructurenearthepalace,andfrontingtheport;andthatitwassurroundedwithaportico,inwhichthephilosopherswalked。Headds,thatthemembersofthissocietyweregovernedbyapresident,whosestationwassohonourableandimportant,that,inthetimeofthePtolemies,hewasalwayschosenbythekinghimself,andafterwardsbytheRomanemperor;andthattheyhadahallwherethewholesocietyatetogetherattheexpenseofthepublic,bywhomtheyweresupportedinaveryplentifulmanner。”

Amongtheothereventscontributingtothedeplorablelosseswhichmankindhassustainedinthisrespect,asadonewaswhenthemostancientinkwritingsoftheChinesewereorderedtobedestroyedbytheiremperorChee-Whange-Tee,inthethirdcenturybeforeChrist,withtheavowedpurposethateverythingshouldbeginanewasfromhisreign。Thesmallportionofthemwhichescapeddestructionwererecoveredandpreservedbyhissuccessors。

CHAPTERIII。

CLASSICALINKANDITSEXODUS。

THEMATERIALSANDMETHODSEMPLOYEDINPREPARING

THEINKMSS。OFANTIQUITY——THEINTRODUCTION

OFPARCHMENTASASUBSTITUTEFOR

PAPYRUS——MODEOFWRITINGONPARCHMENT——HOW

SEPARATEPIECESWEREFIRSTJOINEDINTOBOOK

FORM——EVIDENCEOFTHECHARACTEROFWRITING

UTENSILSTOBEFOUNDINANCIENTPICTURES——SOME

FORMULASBYTHEYOUNGERPLINYANDHISCONTEMPORARY

DIOSCORIDES——HOWTHEGREEKSAND

ROMANSKEPTTHEIRPAPYRIFROMBREAKING——WHEN

BLACKINKBEGANTOFALLINTODISUSEANDITS

CAUSE——THEADOPTIONOFTHESTYLUSANDITSACCOMPANYING

SHEETSOFLEAD,IVORY,METALAND

WOODCOATEDWITHWAX——THEEFFORTSMADETO

RESUMETHEUSEOFSOMEINKWHICHWOULDBIND

TOPARCHMENT——WHYTHEREARENOORIGINALMSS。

EXTANTBELONGINGTOTHETIMEOFCHRIST——THE

INVENTIONOFTHEVITRIOLICINKS——HUMPHREY’S

BLUNDERINLOCATINGDATESOFEARLYGREEK

MSS——THEDESTRUCTIONOFTHECITIESOFHERCULANEUM

ANDPOMPEII——AWAKENINGOFINTEREST

AGAINABOUTTHEEMPLOYMENTOFINKS——REDISCOVERIES

OFSOMEOFTHEMOREREMOTEANCIENT

RECIPES——THEWRITERSINGOLDANDSILVER——RECORDED

INSTANCESOFILLUMINATEDMSS——PASSAGE

FROMTHEBOOKOFJOBWRITTENBYST。

JEROME——DENIALOFTHEEMPLOYMENTOFTANNO-

GALLATEOFIRONINKINTHEFOURTHCENTURY——

DESTRUCTIONOFTHEINSPIREDWRITINGSBYORDER

OFTHEROMANSENATE——THEECLIPSEOFCLASSICAL

LITERATUREANDDISMEMBERMENTOFTHE

ROMANEMPIRE——POEMONTHETHOUSANDYEARS

KNOWNASTHEDARKAGESWHICHFOLLOWED。

THEOPHRASTUSsaysthatthepapyrusbooksoftheancientswerenootherthanrollspreparedinthefollowingmanner:Twoleavesoftherushwereplasteredtogether,usuallywiththemudoftheNile,insuchafashionthatthefibresofoneleafshouldcrossthefibresoftheotheratrightangles;theendsofeachbeingthencutoff,asquareleafwasobtained,equallycapableofresistingfracturewhenpulledortakenholdofinanydirection。Inthisformthepapyriwereexportedingreatquantities。Inordertoformthesesingleleavesintothe“scapi。”orrollsoftheancients,abouttwentyweregluedtogetherendtoend。Thewritingwasthenexecutedinparallelcolumnsafewincheswide,runningtransverselytothelengthofthescroll。Toeachendofthescrollswereattachedroundstavessimilartothoseweuseformaps。Tothesestaves,strings,knownas“umbilici。”wereattached,totheendsofwhichbullaeorweightswerefixed。

字体大小
背景颜色