下载辰思小说免费APP
toagreatage,andbutlittleabletowork,shegrewtobeseriouslyafraid,
that,atlast,shemightbecomechargeabletotheparish(theheaviest,in
herestimation,ofallhumancalamities),andthatthusalarmedshedidsuffer
herselfmorethanonce,duringtheexacerbationsofafitofdistempered
despondency,peevishly(andperhapspetulantly)toexclaimthatGodAlmighty,
bysufferinghertoremainsolonguponearth,seemedactuallytohaveforgotten
her。’’Such,’concludesEden,’arethesimpleannalsofDameStrudwick:and
herhistorian,partialtohissubject,closesitwithlamentingthatsuch
villagememoirshavenotoftenerbeensoughtforandrecorded。’(2*)This
wastheidealcharacterforthecottage。HowEdenoranybodyelsewouldhave
hatedthispoorwomaninwhomeverykindlyfeelinghadbeenstarvedtodeath
ifshehadbeeninhisownclass!WeknowfromCreeveywhathisfriendsthought
of’thestingykip’Lambtonwhentheyfoundthemselvesunderhisroof,where
’aroundofbeefatasidetablewasrunatwithasmuchkeennessasabanker’s
shopbeforeastoppage。’AlittlepeevishnessorevenpetulancewithGod
Almightywouldnothaveseemedthemostseriouschargethatcouldbebrought
againstsuchaneighbour。ButifeveryvillagerhadhadDameStrudwick’s
hardandnarrowvirtues,andhadcrushedallothertastesandinterestsin
thepassionforlivingonashillingadayinacoldandbitterindependence,
theproblemofpreservingthemonopoliesofthefewwithoutdisorderortrouble
wouldhavebeengreatlysimplified。Therewouldhavebeenlittledanger,
asBurkewouldhavesaid,thatthefruitsofsuccessfulindustryandthe
accumulationsoffortunewouldbeexposedto’theplunderofthenegligent,
thedisappointed,andtheunprosperous。’
Thewayinwhichtherulingclassregardedthepoorisillustratedin
thetoneofthediscussionswhentheproblemofpovertyhadbecomeacute
attheendoftheeighteenthcentury。WhenPitt,whohadbeenpesteredby
Edentoreadhisbook,handedavolumetoCanning,thenhissecretary,that
brilliantyoungpoliticianspenthistimewritingaparodyonthegrotesque
namestohefoundintheAppendix,anditwillberecollectedthatPittexcused
himselfforabandoninghisschemeforreformingthePoorLaw,ontheground
thathewasinexperiencedintheconditionofthepoor。Itwasnoshameto
apoliticiantobeignorantofsuchsubjects。Thepoorwerehappyorunhappy
intheviewoftherulingclassaccordingtothesympathytherichbestowed
onthem。Iftherewereoccasionalmisgivingstheywereeasilydispelled。
Thusonephilosopherpointedoutthatthoughthepositionofthepoorman
mightseemwantingindignityorindependence,itshouldberememberedby
wayofconsolationthathecouldplaythetyrantoverhiswifeandchildren
asmuchasheliked。(3*)Anothertrainofsoothingreflectionswasstarted
bysuchpapersasthatpublishedintheAnnalsofAgriculturein1797,
underthetitle’OntheComfortsenjoyedbytheCottagerscomparedtothose
oftheancientBarons。’Insuchasocietyasentimentlikethatexpressed
byFoxwhensupportingWhitbread’sBillin1795,that’itwasnotfitting
inafreecountrythatthegreatbodyofthepeopleshoulddependonthe
charityoftherich,’seemedachallengingparadox。Edenthoughtthisan
extraordinarywayoflookingattheproblem,andretortedthatitwasgratifying
toseehowreadytherichweretobestowtheirbenevolentattentions。This
wasthepointofviewofPittandofalmostallthespeakersinthedebate
thatfollowedFox’soutburst,Buxtongoingsofarastosaythatowingto
thoseattentionstheconditionofthepoorhadneverbeen’soeligible。’
JustastheboisterouscaptaininEvelinathoughtitwasanhonourtoawretched
FrenchwomantoberolledinBritishmud,sotheEnglishHouseofCommons
thoughtthatpovertywasturnedintoapositiveblessingbythekindness
oftherich。
Writingtowardstheendoftheancientré;gime,Cobbettmaintained
thatinhisownlifetimethetoneandlanguageofsocietyaboutthepoor
hadchangedverygreatlyfortheworse,thattheoldnameof’thecommons
ofEngland’hadgivenwaytosuchnamesas’thelowerorders,’’thepeasantry,’
and’thepopulation,’andthatwhenthepoormettogethertodemandtheir
rightstheywereinvariablyspokenofbysuchcontumelioustermsas’the
populace’or’themob。’’Inshort,bydegreesbeginningaboutfiftyyears
agotheindus
后续内容为VIP可读请开通VIP,或购买此章节